NEW WORK IN CELL DEATH AND DISEASE - OPEN ACCESS

We report a paradoxical contribution of the differentiation signal to genomic instability and aggressiveness of squamous cancer (SCC).

https://www.nature.com/cddis/journal/v8/n6/full/cddis2017259a.html

Inefficient differentiation response to cell cycle stress leads to genomic instability and malignant progression of squamous carcinoma cells

Pilar Alonso-Lecue^1,11, Isabel de Pedro^1,11, Vincent Coulon², Rut Molinuevo¹, Corina Lorz³, Carmen Segrelles³, Laura Ceballos¹, Daniel López-Aventín⁴, Ana García-Valtuille⁵, José M Bernal^1,6, Francisco Mazorra^5,7, Ramón M Pujol^4,8, Jesús Paramio³, J Ramón Sanz^1,5,9, Ana Freije¹, Agustí Toll^4,8 and Alberto Gandarillas^1,10

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or epidermoid cancer is a frequent and aggressive malignancy. However in apparent paradox it retains the squamous differentiation phenotype except for very dysplastic lesions. We have shown that cell cycle stress in normal epidermal keratinocytes triggers a squamous differentiation response involving irreversible mitosis block and polyploidisation. Here we show that cutaneous SCC cells conserve a partial squamous DNA damage-induced differentiation response that allows them to overcome the cell division block. The capacity to divide in spite of drug-induced mitotic stress and DNA damage made well-differentiated SCC cells more genomically instable and more malignant in vivo. Consistently, in a series of human biopsies, non-metastatic SCCs displayed a higher degree of chromosomal alterations and higher expression of the S phase regulator Cyclin E and the DNA damage signal γH2AX than the less aggressive, non-squamous, basal cell carcinomas. However, metastatic SCCs lost the γH2AX signal and Cyclin E, or accumulated cytoplasmic Cyclin E. Conversely, inhibition of endogenous Cyclin E in well-differentiated SCC cells interfered with the squamous phenotype. The results suggest a dual role of cell cycle stress-induced differentiation in squamous cancer: the resulting mitotic blocks would impose, when irreversible, a proliferative barrier, when reversible, a source of genomic instability, thus contributing to malignancy.